-
-
Case Review
-
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
Monthly Archives: March 2011
California has a law that grants people, usually celebrities, a right to control the name and likeness. If someone uses another’s name, voice or likeness without their consent that person is infringing on the celebrities’ right of publicity. A conflict develops when another uses the image of a celebrity but makes changes that amounts to an artistic expression. The courts need to balance the right to publicity against a First Amendment right of freedom of artistic expression. Recognizing these competing interests the court held that “what is essentially a balancing test between the First Amendment and the right of publicity based on whether the work in question adds significant creative elements so as to be transformed into something more than a mere celebrity likeness or imitation.” More on this later.