-
-
Case Review
-
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
Monthly Archives: June 2011
The second time around appears to be a charm for potential Presidential candidate Sarah Palin and her daughter Bristol. The two already attempted to trademark their names once before, but the US Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) rejected their applications because they had failed to sign them. Details on registering and defending trademarks are available from a Los Angeles business litigation attorney. Sarah and Bristol refilled, and media sources report that there appear to be no hurdles to their applications this time. Once a person or entity files a trademark application, the USPTO sets a date by which others may challenge the trademark. Bristol’s deadline was June 10, and there were no challenges. Likewise, there were no challenges to Sarah’s application, as her deadline was June 17. The USPTO said that the two Palins should receive their trademarks about three months down the line. Their respective applications demonstrate how the…
Read More »
It might sound strange to hear about a father battling a company over the use of his son’s name and image, but this is the predicament that Michael Jackson’s father Joe finds himself in. Joe was close to entering into a deal with French fragrance creator Franck Rouas to create fragrances for men and women, “Jackson’s Tribute for Men” and “Jackson’s Legend for Women.” The deal went awry when the company that owns the rights to sell products under Michael’s name intervened. Bravado filed a lawsuit against Joe the day before the unveiling of the fragrances at a party in Las Vegas. The company describes Joe and Rouas as unlicensed distributors who were using the Michael Jackson trademark illegally. A Los Angeles litigation lawyer can provide celebrities guidance on trademark protections that are available. Bravado asked the court to ban the sale of the perfumes and sought $150,000 in damages…
Read More »